Contribution of clinical information to the predictive performance of plasma β-amyloid levels for amyloid positron emission tomography positivity

Chun, Min Young and Jang, Hyemin and Kim, Hee Jin and Kim, Jun Pyo and Gallacher, John and Allué, José Antonio and Sarasa, Leticia and Castillo, Sergio and Pascual-Lucas, María and Na, Duk L. and Seo, Sang Won (2023) Contribution of clinical information to the predictive performance of plasma β-amyloid levels for amyloid positron emission tomography positivity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15. ISSN 1663-4365

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/3/package-entries/fnagi-15-1126799-r2/fnagi-15-1126799.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/3/package-entries/fnagi-15-1126799-r2/fnagi-15-1126799.pdf - Published Version

Download (922kB)

Abstract

Background: Early detection of β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation, a major biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), has become important. As fluid biomarkers, the accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ for predicting Aβ deposition on positron emission tomography (PET) has been extensively studied, and the development of plasma Aβ is beginning to receive increased attention recently. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether APOE genotypes, age, and cognitive status increase the predictive performance of plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ levels for Aβ PET positivity.

Methods: We recruited 488 participants who underwent both plasma Aβ and Aβ PET studies (Cohort 1) and 217 participants who underwent both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ and Aβ PET studies (Cohort 2). Plasma and CSF samples were analyzed using ABtest-MS, an antibody-free liquid chromatography-differential mobility spectrometry-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method and INNOTEST enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, respectively. To evaluate the predictive performance of plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ, respectively, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.

Results: When predicting Aβ PET status, both plasma Aβ42/40 ratio and CSF Aβ42 showed high accuracy (plasma Aβ area under the curve (AUC) 0.814; CSF Aβ AUC 0.848). In the plasma Aβ models, the AUC values were higher than plasma Aβ alone model, when the models were combined with either cognitive stage (p < 0.001) or APOE genotype (p = 0.011). On the other hand, there was no difference between the CSF Aβ models, when these variables were added.

Conclusion: Plasma Aβ might be a useful predictor of Aβ deposition on PET status as much as CSF Aβ, particularly when considered with clinical information such as APOE genotype and cognitive stage.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Eprint Open STM Press > Medical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email admin@eprint.openstmpress.com
Date Deposited: 25 Apr 2023 09:34
Last Modified: 14 Nov 2023 06:27
URI: http://library.go4manusub.com/id/eprint/51

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item